NASA climate scientist Dr James Hansen has made some comments on the US presidential election and on Australian climate change policy.

Hansen describes why he is cautious about whether the winning candidate in the US presidential election will actually deliver on climate change and states:

My caution about what a winning candidate will actually deliver is based on experience. If my “Trip Report” (http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/20080804_TripReport.pdf), recounting dismal failure to help officials in various countries “get it”, did not convince you, I offer another example: Australia. Response to my “Dear Prime Minister Rudd” is at (http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/20080401_DearPrimeMinisterRudd_reply.pdf) hardly illuminates the Australian position, but their subsequently stated goals of 450-550 ppm CO2 does. That plan appears to have been written by the coal industry, and, if adopted globally, practically guarantees destruction of most life on the planet. I would be more critical, except that much of the problem is probably due to our failure to make the climate story clear enough. More later on this topic and the ways in which moneyed interests finagle “cap and trade” to everybody else’s detriment.